The human
intestine maintains within its inner cavity a complex,
crowded environment of food remnants and microbial
organisms (called "the intestinal flora") from
which the body derives nourishment and against which the
body must be protected. The relationship between the
human host and her army of microbes is described by the
Greek word, symbiosis, which means "living
together". When symbiosis benefits both
parties, it is called mutualism. When symbiosis
becomes harmful, it is called dysbiosis. The
first line of protection against dysbiosis and
intestinal toxicity is strict control of intestinal
permeability, the ability of the gut to allow some
substances to pass through its walls while denying
access to others. The healthy gut selectively absorbs
nutrients and seals out those components of the normal
internal milieu which are most likely to cause harm,
except for a small sampling which it uses to educate and
strengthen its mechanisms of immunity and
detoxification.
Bacteria form
the largest segment of the intestinal flora. The number
of bacteria in the large bowel (about a hundred
trillion) exceeds the number of cells in the human body.
Intestinal bacteria perform some useful functions, so
that our relationship with them is normally one of
mutual benefit. They synthesize half a dozen vitamins,
supplementing those which are obtained from food. They
convert dietary fibre--that part of food which humans
cannot digest--into small fatty acids which nourish the
cells of the large intestine. They degrade dietary
toxins like methyl mercury making them less harmful to
the body. They crowd out pathogenic bacteria like Salmonella,
decreasing the risk of food poisoning. They stimulate
the development of a vigorous immune response.
Four-fifths of the body's immune system is located in
the lining of the small intestine.
Bacteria are
dangerous tenants, however, so that dysbiosis is
a common problem. As powerful chemical factories,
bacteria not only make vitamins and destroy toxins, but
also destroy vitamins and make toxins. Bacterial enzymes
can inactivate human digestive enzymes and convert human
bile or components of food into chemicals which promote
the development of cancer. Some by-products of bacterial
enzyme activity, like ammonia, hinder normal brain
function. When absorbed into the body, they must be
removed by the liver. People whose livers fail this
task, because of conditions like cirrhosis, develop
progressive neurologic dysfunction resulting in coma and
death. For them, the administration of antibiotics which
slow the production of nerve toxins by intestinal
bacteria can be life saving.
The immune
reactions provoked by normal intestinal bacteria may be
harmful rather than helpful. Inflammatory diseases of
the bowel, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's
disease (ileitis), and several types of arthritis have
been linked to aberrant immune responses provoked by
intestinal bacteria. Two types of aberrancy have been
described. First, intestinal bacteria contain proteins
which look to the immune system very much like human
proteins; they confuse the immune system and may fool
the body into attacking itself. Second, fragments of
dead bacteria may leak into the wall of the intestine or
into the blood stream due to a breakdown in the
mechanisms which regulate intestinal permeability.
Circulating through the body, bacterial debris is
deposited in tissues such as joints, provoking an attack
on those tissues by an immune system trying to remove
the foreign material.
Bacterial
colonies in the human intestine co-exist with colonies
of yeasts, which are no less dangerous, just far fewer
in number. Bacterial colonization prevents yeasts from
expanding their niche. Frequent or prolonged use of
antibiotics decimates bacterial colonies, removing the
natural brake on yeast growth. The most obvious effects
of yeast overgrowth are local infections, like vaginitis,
produced when yeast invade and disrupt cells which line
the body's surface. Intestinal yeast infections can
cause chronic diarrhea, although most
gastroenterologists fail to recognize this. Yeast can
also provoke allergic reactions, precipitating asthma,
hives, psoriasis or abdominal pain. The occurrence of
allergic symptoms or the aggravation of a pre-existing
allergy which follows the use of antibiotics should
always prompt an investigation into yeast overgrowth as
a potential trigger. Neglect of this factor by
allergists has left countless patients trapped in a
spiral of increasing allergic reactivity, augmented each
time antibiotics are prescribed.
In addition to
bacteria and yeast, most of the world's four billion
people are also colonized by intestinal parasites.
Contrary to popular belief, parasitic infection is not
unusual in the U.S. population. It is a common ocurrence,
even among those who have never left the country.
Unlike
bacteria, parasites appear to serve no useful function.
The part of the immune system which they stimulate does
not strengthen the organism to resist serious infection;
instead it contributes to allergic reactions, so that
parasitic infection increases allergic tendencies. There
are two general groups of parasites. The first consists
of worms--tapeworms and roundworms--which attach
themselves to the lining of the small intestine, causing
internal bleeding and loss of nutrients. People infested
with worms may have no symptoms or may slowly become
anemic. The second category is the protozoa,
one-celled organisms like the amoeba which caused John
Gerard's colitis. The first protozoa were discovered
over three hundred years ago by Antonie van Leeuwenhoek,
the most famous of the early microscopists. When the
inquisitive Dutchman set about to examine everything in
the world that would fit under the lens of a microscope,
he found organisms in his own stool that closely match
the description later given to Giardia lamblia.
Giardia
is the major cause of day-care diarrhea. Twenty to
thirty per cent of workers in day care centers harbor Giardia.
Most have no symptoms; they are merely carriers. A study
at Johns Hopkins medical school a few years ago
demonstrated antibodies against Giardia in twenty
per cent of randomly chosen blood samples from patients
in the hospital. This means that at least twenty per
cent of these patients had been infected with Giardia
at some time in their lives and had mounted an immune
response against the parasite.
In 1990 I
presented a paper before the American College of
Gastroenterology which demonstrated Giardia
infection in about half of a group of two hundred
patients with chronic diarrhea, constipation, abdominal
pain and bloating. Most of these patients had been told
they had irritable bowel syndrome, which is commonly
referred to as "nervous stomach". I reached
two conclusions from this study: (1) Parasitic infection
is a common event among patients with chronic
gastrointestinal symptoms. (2) Many people are given a
diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome without a thorough
evaluation. My presentation was reported by numerous
magazines and newspapers, including the New York Times.
My office was flooded with hundreds of phone calls from
people who were suffering with chronic gastrointestinal
complaints. Most of them had been given a diagnosis of
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) by their physicians. The
standard treatment for this syndrome had not helped
them. All they had received was a label. Many had been
told there was no cure. In evaluating these patients, I
found that the majority had intestinal parasites, food
intolerance or a lack of healthy intestinal bacteria.
These conditions were not mutually exclusive. Many
patients had more than one reason for chronic
gastrointestinal problems. Treating these abnormalities
as they occurred in various patients produced remarkably
good therapeutic results. A year later, researchers in
the Department of Family Medicine at Baylor University
in Houston reported findings similar to mine.
Giardia
contaminates streams and lakes throughout North America
and has caused epidemics of diarrheal disease in several
small cities by contaminating their drinking water. One
epidemic, in Placerville, California, was followed by an
epidemic of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, which swept
through the town's residents at the time of the Giardia
epidemic. Possibly, this epidemic was due to failure of
some people to eradicate the parasite. In 1991, my
colleagues and I published a study of 96 patients with
chronic fatigue and demonstrated active Giardia
infection in 46 per cent.
Sometimes, the
intestinal damage produced by giardiasis persists for
months after the parasite has been successfully treated.
The impairment of digestion and absorption which results
from this damage may cause fatigue and other symptoms.
When I first
began presenting the results of my clinical research on
parasitic infection, in the mid-1980's, my reports were
met with considerable skepticism. The present decade has
witnessed an increased awareness of parasitic infection
as a common public health problem in the United States,
thanks largely to Cryptosporidium, which recently
achieved notoriety for contaminating Milwaukee's water
supply, causing the largest epidemic of diarrhea in U.S.
history, infecting 400,000 people and causing over one
hundred deaths. Most municipal water supplies in the
U.S. today are home to protozoa like Giardia and Cryptosporidium
and one in five Americans drinks water that violates
federal health standards. Every year, almost a million
North Americans become sick from water-borne diseases;
about one per cent die. Further epidemics are
inevitable. A recent epidemic occurred in Clark County,
Nevada, despite state-of-the-art municipal water
treatment.
How protozoa
make people sick is not clear. Some directly invade the
lining of the intestine, others provoke an allergic
reaction that causes the damage. It appears certain that
humans coexist quite readily with their parasites as
long as the barrier formed by the intestinal lining
remains fully intact, so that the parasites cannot
attach to the wall of the bowel. Millions of people
throughout the world are carriers of E. histolytica;
the organism can be found in stool samples but it does
not seem to make them ill. The variability of pathogenic
potential recalls Pasteur's challenge to the French
Academy: do the causes of disease lie within the microbe
or do they lie within the host? When the attachment of a
parasite initiates a series of injuries to the
intestinal wall that increase its permeability, it
generates a cascade of reactions that can shatter a
person's health in many different ways. Excessive
permeability permits excess absorption of antigens and
microbial fragments from the gut, over-stimulating the
immune response, fostering allergy and auto-immunity.
Excess
permeability also allows excessive absorption of toxins
derived from the chemical activity of intestinal
bacteria, stressing the liver. All materials absorbed
from the intestine must pass through the liver before
entering the body's general circulation. Here, in the
cells of the liver, toxic chemicals are destroyed or
else prepared for excretion out of the body. The cost of
detoxification is high; free radicals are generated and
the liver's stores of anti-oxidants are depleted. The
liver may be damaged by the products of its own attempts
at detoxification. Damage may extend to the pancreas.
Free radicals are excreted into bile; this
"toxic" bile flows into the small intestine
and can ascend into the ducts which carry pancreatic
juices, damaging the pancreas, aggravating malnutrition.
The symptoms
produced by excessive intestinal permeability may be
limited to the abdomen or may involve the entire body.
They may include fatigue and malaise, joint and muscle
pain, headache and skin eruptions. The clinical
disorders associated with increased intestinal
permeability include any inflammation of the large or
small intestine (colitis and enteritis), chronic
arthritis , skin conditions like acne, eczema, hives or
psoriasis, migraine headaches, chronic fatigue,
deficient pancreatic function and AIDS . In most cases,
it is incorrect to think of excessive permeability as
the cause of these disorders. Instead, excess
permeability occurs as part of the chain of events which
causes disease and aggravates existing symptoms or
produces new ones.
Just as
excessive permeability may have many different effects,
it may also have many different causes, each of which
may add to the effects of the other. These causes
include intestinal infection of any type (viral,
bacterial or protozoan), alcohol, and NSAIDs
(non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) which increase
permeability by decreasing the body's synthesis of
beneficial prostaglandins. Allergic reactions to foods
also produce an increase in intestinal permeability.
The fate of
people treated for chronic arthritis exemplifies the
spiral of problems caused by excessive intestinal
permeability. Arthritis (inflammation of the joints) is
the leading cause of physical disability in
industrialized countries.
Some forms of
arthritis are preceded by increased intestinal
permeability. People with inflammation of the intestine
are prone to develop inflammatory arthritis which may
continue for many years after the intestinal
inflammation is healed. Fragments of intestinal bacteria
have been identified in the joints in some cases. In
others, antibodies directed against intestinal bacteria
may attack the person's own joint tissue, causing an
auto-immune reaction.
For most people
with chronic arthritis, however, excessive intestinal
permeability develops as a result of arthritis
and its treatment and may aggravate the arthritis,
creating a vicious cycle. People with any type of severe
arthritis usually take large doses of NSAIDs on a daily
basis to control the pain, stiffness and swelling in
their joints; they rapidly develop increased intestinal
permeability. Excessive permeability allows bacteria or
bacterial antigen to penetrate the wall of the
intestine, creating a smoldering inflammation in the
intestinal wall (called enteritis), which in turn
further increases intestinal permeability. Enteritis
develops in seventy per cent of people taking NSAIDs
daily for two weeks. The excessive permeability caused
by drug-induced enteritis allows fragments of bacteria
to enter the circulation, where they cause or aggravate
more arthritis.
Much of the
research on intestinal permeability and NSAIDs has been
conducted with people who suffer from rheumatoid
arthritis, an inflammation which affects many joints at
the same time and is especially noticeable in the hands.
It typically strikes women in their twenties or thirties
and lasts for life, crippling thirty per cent of its
victims with severe deformities of the affected joints
and shortening their life expectancy by ten to fifteen
years. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis taking NSAIDs
develop antibodies against components of the normal
intestinal bacteria. Development of an abnormal or
excessive immune response is called sensitization.
Sensitization to intestinal bacteria may cause or
aggravate arthritis. When patients with rheumatoid
arthritis take antibiotics which reduce the numbers of
intestinal bacteria, not only does their enteritis clear
up, but their arthritis also improves. NSAIDs, the
standard treatment for arthritis, by increasing
intestinal permeability, create a new problem which
aggravates the old one. Increased intestinal
permeability explains the beneficial effects of diet for
the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Fasting and
vegetarian diets benefit patients with rheumatoid
arthritis. Fasting reduces the excessive intestinal
permeability of patients with rheumatoid arthritis while
at the same time dramatically improving symptoms.
Vegetarian diets alter the bacterial growth in the
intestine, acting in a sense like natural, highly
selective antibiotics. Those people who respond to
vegetarianism with a change in the intestinal bacteria
are the ones that benefit. Those people who do not
change their intestinal bacteria as a result of changing
their diets do not improve their arthritis by becoming
vegetarians.
There is a
common belief that avoiding specific foods can benefit
people with arthritis. One effect of the increased
permeability produced by NSAIDs is to increase the
absorption of antigens coming from food. People with
rheumatoid arthritis frequently become sensitized to
food proteins. Their arthritis often improves when they
avoid specific foods and then flares up when they
consume those foods. I have treated enough patients with
rheumatoid arthritis to know that food allergy is not the
cause of rheumatoid arthritis. It is part of the
cycle of immunologic sensitization, inflammation and
increased intestinal permeability that occurs in most
patients with severe arthritis. The treatments that are
used for chronic arthritis may temporarily relieve pain
but they help to maintain the vicious cycle. Perhaps
this explains why the long term outlook for patients
with rheumatoid arthritis is so bleak and has not been
improved by any of the drug therapies developed over the
past thirty years. Professor Ann Parke, of the
University of Connecticut, voiced an opinion not often
heard from rheumatologists, "...maybe NSAIDs have
had their day. We should, instead, be striving to maintain
the integrity of the gastrointestinal tract in an
attempt to prevent the disease at a potential source,
rather than treating the complaints and risking
perpetuating the disease."
If medicine is
to regain its Hippocratic roots, preserving and
restoring health, then physicians must learn the science
of preserving and restoring normal intestinal
permeability. This is not an attempt to
"cleanse" the colon with laxatives or enemas
or to correct constipation. In the early years of the
twentieth century, "auto-intoxication" was a
fashionable concept. It was considered to be the cause
of chronic fatigue, stomach ulcers, rheumatoid
arthritis, high blood pressure, hardening of the
arteries, breast cancer and ovarian cysts. The complex
regulation of intestinal permeability was not understood
and autointoxication was attributed to "intestinal
stasis", a fancy term for constipation. In keeping
with the spirit of the times, it was treated invasively:
enemas for mild cases, colectomy (surgical removal of
the large intestine) in severe cases. Even institutions
as august as the Mayo Clinic sanctioned colectomies for
autointoxication during the first two decades of the
twentieth century.
The
preservation and restoration of normal intestinal
permeability rests on two principles: building
resistance and reducing risk. A diet of high
nutrient density, described in Chapter...., is the
cornerstone for maintenance of intestinal health. The
intestinal lining has the fastest growth rate of any
tissue in the body. Old cells slough off and a
completely new lining is generated every three to six
days. The metabolic demands of this normally rapid cell
turnover must be met if excess permeability is to be
prevented or if healing is to occur. Thorough chewing of
food may be important. Saliva contains a substance
called epidermal growth factor (EGF) which stimulates
growth and repair of tissue. EGF has been used
therapeutically to heal the intestine when injured or
inflamed.
Essential fatty
acids play an important role in maintenance of
intestinal integrity. Fish oils limit the intestinal
injury caused by toxic drugs and GLA (found in primrose,
borage or black currant oils) stimulates production of
prostaglandins which help to maintain normal
permeability. The principles for EFA supplementation
detailed on pages.....should be followed. Merely
consuming large quantities of vegetable oils, however,
is likely to be harmful to the intestinal lining. High
intake of polyunsaturated oils increases the free
radical content of bile, producing a toxic bile that may
damage intestinal integrity.
In addition to
a nutrient dense diet, there are several specific
dietary resistance factors which warrant careful
attention for their ability to preserve normal
intestinal integrity and should be part of any program
for intestinal detoxification.
(1) FIBRE
Fibre is the
term that describes remnants of plant cells that are
resistant to human digestion. The usual sources are
vegetables, cereals, bread, nuts, seeds and fruits.
Eating a fibre deficient diet increases intestinal
permeability. Although medical researchers have been
recommending high fibre diets for about twenty years,
and sales of metamucil and other bulk laxatives have
gone up, there has been no significant increase in fibre
consumption from food and the fibre intake of Americans
is far below recommended levels. This is unfortunate,
because the fibre found in food is far more complex than
the purified powders sold in drug stores.
There are many
different chemical types of fibre, but the most
important distinction is between soluble and insoluble
fibre. Soluble fibre dissolves in water, forming a thick
gel. Fruit pectin, for example, is a highly solube fibre.
Psyllium seed, the commonest source of bulk laxatives,
contains fibre that is moderately solube. Wheat bran
consists of relatively insoluble fibre that is most
readily evident as "roughage". Although all
fibre adds bulk to bowel movements, the chemical effects
of the different types of fibre can be opposite.
Soluble fibre
feeds the intestinal bacteria, which ferment it to
produce chemicals called short chain fatty acids (SCFAs).
SCFAs have a number of positive effects on the body:
they nourish the cells of the large intestine,
stimulating healing and reducing the development of
cancer. When absorbed from the intestine, they travel to
the liver and decrease the liver's production of
cholesterol, lowering blood cholesterol levels. Oat
bran, for example, contains fibres of moderate
solubility; eating oat bran can lower cholesterol
levels. Within the intestinal canal, SCFAs inhibit the
growth of yeasts and disease-causing bacteria. The
effects of soluble fibre are not always beneficial,
however. Feeding high levels of soluble fibre
supplements like guar gum encourages an overgrowth of
the normal intestinal bacteria which deprives the body
of vitamin B12 and produces an increase in the
concentration of bacterial toxins. Although low fibre
diets increase gut permeability, excessive consumption
of soluble fibre from supplements can also cause
excessive permeability and may create changes in the
intestinal milieu that actually enhance the development
of stomach or bowel cancer.
Insoluble fibre
does not feed bacteria well and is not readily fermented
to SCFAs. Eating wheat bran, which is largely insoluble
fibre, has no effect on blood cholesterol levels.
Insoluble fibre inactivates intestinal toxins, however,
and high intake of insoluble fibre is associated with a
decreased risk of colon and breast cancer. Supplements
of insoluble fibre as wheat bran or pure cellulose
appear to decrease the risk of bowel cancer. Insoluble
fibres also inhibit the ability of disease-causing
bacteria and parasites to attach themselves to the
intestinal wall. Insoluble fibre plays an important role
in preventing excess intestinal permeability.
It should be
obvious that humans need a mixture of soluble and
insoluble fibres in the diet and that food, not
supplements, is the best source. Eating high fibre foods
protects against the development of the major
degenerative diseases of the modern world--heart disease
and cancer--increases longevity and protects against the
development of parasitic infection. The best sources of
mixed fibres are unrefined cereal grains (oats, brown
rice, whole wheat), peas, beans and squash. Among
fruits, one gets the most fibre per serving from apples
and berries.
Some high fibre
foods contain natural chemicals which help to maintain
normal intestinal permeability by unique mechanisms.
Carrots, carob, blueberries and raspberries contain
complex sugars (oligosaccharides) which interfere with
the binding of pathogenic bacteria to the intestinal
lining. These have been used in Europe for centuries for
the treatment or prevention of diarrhea. Synthetic
oligosaccharides are presently being developed as drugs
for treating infection. Brown rice is the source of
gamma-oryzanol, a group of powerful antioxidants which
have been tested extensively in Japan for their ability
to heal intestinal and stomach ulcers and alleviate a
variety of chronic gastrointestinal complaints. Gamma-oryzanol
can be consumed in rice bran or rice bran oil or in pill
form. The therapeutic dose is 100 mg three times a day.
If you become
constipated when increasing dietary fibre, you may need
more fluid. Drink eight glasses of liquid a day, between
meals, not with meals.
(2) FRIENDLY
FLORA
A large body of
research over the past ninety years has demonstrated the
preventive value of eating foods fermented with Lactobacilli
or their cousins, Bifidobacteria. Eating these
friendly bacteria prevents intestinal infection due to
viruses or pathogenic bacteria and preserves intestinal
permeability in the face of infection or other types of
injury, can prevent antibiotic-induced diarrhea and
travelers diarrhea and can lower serum cholesterol
levels. Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria
also show anti-cancer activity, by two mechanisms: they
inhibit the growth or activity of cancer-promoting
bacteria and some strains actually produce chemicals
which inhibit tumor growth.
There are
numerous species of Lactobacilli and many strains
for each species. Some, like Lactobacillus
acidophilus, are normal inhabitants of the human
digestive tract. Others, like L. bulgaricus,
which is a common starter for making yogurt, are not. L.
bulgaricus disappears from the intestine within two
weeks after yogurt consumption is stopped. Sauerkraut is
sour because of L. plantarum, a beneficial
organism that is normally found in the human intestine
and that stays for a long time after being introduced.
Commercially available fermented foods are,
unfortunately, unreliable as sources of Lactobacilli,
because the lactic acid and hydrogen peroxide which Lactobacilli
naturally produce may kill the producers themselves if
their concentration becomes excessive. A few years ago,
the Annals of Internal Medicine published a study
which proved what many women have known for years, that
eating yogurt daily can prevent vaginal yeast
infections. The researchers were lucky. The batch of
yogurt they gave their patients was loaded with living Lactobacillus
acidophilus. These organisms not only took up
residence in the intestines of the women who ate it, but
also colonized the vagina, preventing yeast infection.
When the scientists attempted to perform the same
experiment a year later, they found that the same brand
of yogurt contained no living bacteria.
The most
reliable way to supplement your diet with Lactobacilli
is to make your own yogurt or sauerkraut, or to buy
nutritional supplements which have been tested by an
independent outside laboratory and which list the
concentration of viable bacteria found on culture. Lactobacilli
are killed by heat, moisture and sunlight. The making of
tablets generates heat which lowers the number of viable
organisms. Lactobacilli should be freeze-dried,
in powder or capsules, in opaque moisture-proof
containers, stored in the refrigerator. They should be
consumed with meals. The strains which have been most
extensively tested for their viability in the human
intestine are L.acidophilus strain NCFM-2 and L.plantarum.
L. acidophilus is well-suited to growing in the
small intestine, where it is normally one of the
dominant bacterial species. L. plantarum has
growth characteristics which lead it to grow especially
well in the large intestine. The daily dose should be
between one billion and ten billion viable bacteria.
More may cause gastrointestinal irritation.
"Nutritional
yeast" has been used as a dietary supplement for
generations, as a source of vitamins and minerals and
for treatment of digestive complaints. After treating
hundreds of yeast-allergic patients, I was very
reluctant to prescribe yeast for anyone, until I
discovered a preparation which the French call
"Yeast Against Yeast". The yeasts which invade
human tissues, causing yeast infection, are mostly
members of the genus Candida. The yeast used in
baking bread or brewing beer belong to the genus Saccharomyces.
Yeast Against Yeast is Saccharomyces boulardii, a
microbe which inhabits the surface of many different
plants and which was first isolated from lichee nuts in
Southeast Asia by French scientists during the 1920's. Saccharomyces
boulardii has been used in Europe for decades to
treat acute diarrhea and controlled trials have shown it
effective in preventing or treating diarrhea brought on
by antibiotics. S. boulardii appears to exert its
beneficial affects by inactivating bacterial toxins and
by stimulating intestinal immune responses. S.
boulardii has been available in natural food stores
in the United States since 1991. People who are allergic
to baker's yeast may also be allergic to S. boulardii,
but for most people, including women with chronic Candida
infection, Yeast Against Yeast lives up to its name.
(3) SPICE
Before they
were used as seasoning, culinary herbs and spices were
probably used for food preservation. Many varieties have
natural antimicrobial activity and can retard spoilage.
They are also used to mask the flavor of spoiled food,
so I suggest using them at home, where you know the food
they flavor is fresh to begin with.
The world's
most extensively studied spice is garlic. Its medicinal
use predates recorded history. Garlic is mentioned in
the earliest Vedic medical documents, written in India
over five thousand years ago. During an epidemic of
plague in Marseilles, in 1721, four condemned criminals
were enlisted to bury the dead. None of them contracted
plague. It seems that they sustained themselves by
drinking a cocktail of crushed garlic in cheap wine,
which came to be called vinaigre des quatre voleurs
(vinegar of the four thieves). In 1858, Louis Pasteur
demonstrated garlic's antibiotic activity. The herb was
used by Albert Schweitzer for the treatment of amoebic
dysentery at his clinic in Africa. Antimicrobial
activity of garlic has been repeatedly demonstrated
against many species of bacteria, fungi, parasites and
viruses. In addition, garlic lowers cholesterol and
blood pressure and may protect against cancer. The dose
of garlic needed to obtain significant benefit is at
least ten grams (about three small cloves) per day.
Onion, garlic's
closest edible relative, has also been widely used for
medicinal purposes. Although it lacks the potency of
garlic, it can be consumed it much larger quantity, so
that its antimicrobial benefits may be equal to those of
garlic if consumed regularly.
Turmeric, a
major ingredient in curry powder, is a natural
antibiotic that relieves intestinal gas by lowering the
numbers of gas forming bacteria, has antifungal activity
and has been traditionally used for relieving
inflammation. The effective dose is about one gram per
day.
Ginger, which
contains over four hundred chemically active
ingredients, has long been used for the treatment of
digestive complaints. It protects the intestinal lining
against ulceration and has a wide range of actions
against intestinal parasites. Cinnamon, which I
recommend for sweetening the taste of ginger tea, has
anti-fungal activity.
Sage and
rosemary contain the essential oil, eucalyptol, which
kills Candida albicans, bacteria, and worms.
Oregano contains over thirty biologically active
iingredients of which twelve have antibiotic,
anti-viral, anti-parasitic or anti-fungal effects. As
mentioned earlier, thyme has anti-parasitic activity.
Meals seasoned
with these pungent, aromatic herbs, consumed regularly,
help protect against intestinal infection. However,
heating at 200 degrees (Fahrenheit) for twenty minutes
destroys the antibacterial activity of most of these
spices. They should be added to food at the end of
cooking, just before being eaten.
NOTE: If high
fibre diets, friendly flora, or spicy food give you
diarrhea, gas or abdominal bloating, instead of
improving digestive function, you may be changing your
diet too rapidly, or you may have an allergy to one
specific component of the regimen described here. Slow
down and try again. Be methodical, making one change at
a time. First, cut down on sugar and fat, then switch to
whole grains, then add more vegetables. Give yourself a
chance to know how each new food you try affects your
body. It may take a few days. Then add nutritional
supplements, one at a time, allowing yourself three or
four days between each change. Experiment with different
brands. For some people, one preparation of Lactobacillus
will cause diarrhea, but another will not. If you still
find that you cannot increase your consumption of fiber
or flora without feeling worse, rather than better, you
may have an overgrowth of bacteria or yeast in the small
intestine which have adapted to using the fibre you are
taking to expand their niche, rather than to limit their
growth. Bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine is
far more common than doctors suspect and most commonly
results from a lack of stomach acid or from prior
surgery. Yeast overgrowth usually results from taking
antibiotics. Resources for dealing with these problems
are listed in Appendix III.
RISK REDUCTION
The most
common, preventable causes of increased intestinal
permeability are drugs and infections. Aspirin and
NSAIDs should not be taken on a daily basis. Most people
using NSAIDs daily are trying to relieve chronic
headache or joint and muscle pain. Alternative
strategies for pain relief are often available. The
likelihood of benefit depends upon the location of the
pain and the presence or absence of inflammation. Pain
control strategies and resources are listed in Appendix
IV.
After NSAIDs,
alcohol is the drug most likely to destroy normal
intestinal permeability. More than one glass of wine or
beer is likely to be detrimental.
The body's
first line of defense against intestinal infection is
the acid produced by a healthy stomach. Stomach acid
kills most of the bacteria and parasites that are
swallowed along with meals. Strong suppression of
stomach acid increases the risk of intestinal infection.
The widespread use of antacids is, therefore, a reason
for concern, and the FDA's recent decision to make the
acid-lowering drugs Tagamet and Pepcid available without
a doctor's prescription is a terrible disservice to the
American people. Most people who take treatments to
buffer or reduce stomach acid do not need acid reduction
and should avoid it. Tagamet and Pepcid are called H-2
blockers because they block certain effects of histamine
in the body. (Conventional "anti-histamines"
used for treating symptoms of allergy are called H-1
blockers). They were originally developed for the
treatment of ulcers and they made huge profits for the
companies which owned them. Doctors soon began using H-2
blockers for relieving stomach pain which was not caused
by ulcers (this pain is called "non-ulcer
dyspepsia"), even though their efficacy for
non-ulcer pain was disputed. The most common cause of
non-ulcer dyspepsia, by the way, is taking NSAIDs. If
NSAID use were markedly reduced, the frequency of
stomach pain and the need for H-2 blockers would also be
reduced. Recently, it has become quite clear that most
ulcers are triggered by a bacterial infection of the
stomach and that antibiotics are superior to H-2
blockers for treating ulcers. As the need for H-2
blockers in the treatment of ulcers just about vanished,
the FDA suddenly approved their non-prescription use for
the treatment of heartburn. The truth is that H-2
blockers are rarely needed to treat heartburn, because
heartburn is not caused by excess stomach acid. It is
caused by reflux of normal amounts of stomach acid into
the esophagus, which occurs when the valve responsible
for preventing acid reflux is not working properly. The
usual reason for valvular incompetence is dietary.
Coffee, alcohol, chocolate and high fat meals prevent
the valve from closing properly. Calcium, in contrast,
makes it close more tightly.
Almost all
people with frequent heartburn can get relief by eating
small, low fat meals, chewing a calcium tablet after
each, and not eating for four hours before bedtime.
Temporary avoidance of coffee, alcohol, and spicy or
irritating foods until the heartburn stops is also a
good idea. Were these measures followed, the use of H-2
blockers and antacids could be cut by ninety per cent.
A second line
of defense against intestinal infection is the normal
intestinal bacteria, especially Lactobacilli
residing in the small intestine. Antibiotics decimate Lactobacilli.
In so doing, they may increase the risk of subsequent
intestinal infection. Although antibiotics, when
appropriately used, are the most important therapeutic
discovery of modern Western medicine, they are often
used inappropriately and the effects can be devastating.
Whenever I prescribe an antibiotic, I always consider
its possible effect on the beneficial intestinal flora.
An antibiotic that is rapidly and completely absorbed in
the stomach, reaching high levels in the tissues of the
body and low levels in the small or large intestine, is
least likely to harm intestinal ecology. I also
administer Lactobacilli along with the
antibiotics. L. plantarum is the only Lactobacillus
not harmed by antibiotics and can be taken
simultaneously with them.
A key component
of risk reduction is maintaining a safe supply of food
and drink. Epidemics of giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis
from contaminated water and of food poisoning due to Salmonella
in chicken or to toxic strains of E. coli in
hamburger serve notice that the U.S. food and water
supply is not safe. There are guidelines that I give my
patients to help them avoid infection when travelling to
Asia and Africa. These same guidelines should be applied
in the United States, at home or when dining out,
because the food in the U.S. may be no safer than in
many non-industrialized nations. Although some of these
guidelines may seem burdensome, they significantly
reduce the risk of acquiring a food- or water-borne
infection:
(1)
Always wash your hands carefully with soap and water
when returning home from outside and before handling
food. Hand- washing is a very effective way to remove
pathogens. In day care centers, where Giardia
infection can be rampant, the parasite can be found on
surfaces, tables and chairs. Handwashing by the staff
drastically reduces the frequency of diarrhea. Regular
handwashing also protects against catching colds or flu
from other people.
(2)
Do not drink tap water that has not been properly
filtered or kept at a rolling boil for at least five
minutes. Chlorination does not kill the cyst forms of Giardia
or Cryptosporidium, which are extremely hardy.
The most effective way to remove Cryptosporidium
from tap water is to use a reverse osmosis system, which
can be mounted under the sink or on a countertop.
Reverse osmosis also removes many chemical contaminants
from water but is slow and wasteful. To remove Cryptosporidium,
a water filter must have pores that are no larger than
one micrometer. Water filters that effectively remove Cryptosporidium
are certified by the National Sanitation Foundation
(NSF), an independent non-profit organization, under
their Standard 53 for "cyst removal". No water
filter practical for home use will remove bacteria. Have
the bacterial concentration in your drinking water
tested by an independent laboratory. Call the Water
Quality Association at (708) 505-0160 or the American
Council of Independent Laboratories at (202) 887-5872
for the name of a certified laboratory near your home.
The quality of
bottled water is completely unregulated. Some bottled
water comes from municipal water supplies. To discover
the source of any bottled water, call the bottler and
request documentation about the nature and purity of the
source. Bottled water that comes from municipal water
supplies or lakes should be treated by reverse osmosis
before being bottled, if it is to be considered safe.
Avoid using ice
unless you feel secure about the purity of the water
from which it was made. Remember that automatic
icemakers use unfiltered tapwater. Freezing kills most
parasites but does not kill bacteria.
Use pure water
for brushing your teeth and rinsing your toothbrush.
(3)
Peel all fruits and vegetables, unless they are to be
thoroughly cooked. Wash your hands afterwards. If you
cannot peel
them, soak them
for fifteen minutes in a solution made by adding one
teaspoon of three per cent hydrogen peroxide to two
quarts of water and then rinsing thoroughly with
filtered water.
(4)
When eating out, only eat food that has been cooked just
before it is served to you. In many restaurants and
delicatessens, soups, sauces and stews are frequently
stored in large containers, often left uncovered on the
floor and reheated in a microwave oven. Microwave
cooking does not kill Salmonella and other
strains of pathogenic bacteria. It is safest to eat food
that is fairly plain and to avoid soup, unless you know
how food is handled in the restaurant where you are
eating.
(5)
Avoid salad bars. At first glance, salad bars seem like
a good place to get healthy food in a hurry. Look again.
Some years ago the Wall Street Journal sent a
reporter to investigate the cleanliness of salad bars in
different parts of the country. Problems were rampant
and they lay not only with the restaurant but with the
clientele. People are unsanitary in their use of salad
bars. They sometimes sample food and put it back. The
handles of the serving utensils frequently fall into the
food trays, providing an opportunity for contamination.
(6)
Do not eat food that has been prepared by a street
vendor.
(7)
Avoid restaurants where there are flies. Flies can
spread parasitic cysts and pathogenic bacteria.
(8)
Remember that uncooked meat, fish or poultry are often
contaminated with pathogenic bacteria. When preparing
your own meals, always keep raw flesh foods away from
other food that will be eaten raw, like salad. Cook
meat, fish and poultry well and wash your hands after
handling them. Also wash the utensils you use to cut
them. People have become ill by handling chicken
contaminated with Salmonella (as most American
chicken is), and then using a contaminated knife or
contaminated fingers to prepare other food that was not
to be cooked. To kill Salmonella on utensils,
soak them in a solution of chlorox for fifteen minutes,
then make sure you rinse the chlorox thoroughly away. Do
not use dishrags to wipe off kitchen counters, stoves,
sinks and tables. Dishrags actually spread germs around.
Use recycled paper towels to mop up the bacteria-laden
juices from meat, poultry and fish and either use paper
towels or sponges to wipe surfaces. Run the sponges
through the dishwasher every day to thoroughly remove
bacteria.
Tofu is
increasingly popular as a substitute for meat. Tofu that
is bought floating in water has high levels of bacterial
contamination. Wrapped and sealed tofu is safer. To kill
bacteria, tofu should be cooked to an internal
temperature of one hundred and sixty degrees.
(9)
Have your pets de-wormed regularly. Wash your hands
after handling your pets. Do not let your children crawl
on ground where pets are free to roam.
For people
travelling to places where a safe food supply cannot be
assured, despite the implementation of all the
precautions listed above, I recommend the use of
antimicrobial herbs after each meal. My preference is a
combination of berberine (the active ingredient in the
herb goldenseal) and artemisinin (the most active
ingredient in Artemisia annua). This
combination can help to prevent or treat bacterial and
parasitic infection. These herbs should not be taken by
pregnant women, however. The safety profile of
artemisinin is high, but it can induce miscarriage.
There is a
novel approach to control of intestinal pathogens, which
derives from their need for iron. Virtually all
bacteria, except for Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria,
require iron for growth. Animals protect themselves from
infection by making chemicals which bind iron, so that
the microbes cannot use it. Iron-binding proteins called
lactoferrins are concentrated in human milk and
are found inside human white blood cells. The high
lactoferrin in human milk protects breast-fed infants
against intestinal infection. Pure lactoferrin is now
available in capsules and has proved to be very useful
for the prevention and treatment of intestinal
infection, without side effects. It inhibits the growth
of pathogenic bacteria and protozoa by starving them for
iron, while improving iron absorption by the human host.
I recommend that travelers and other people who cannot
control the cleanliness of their food supply take one
thousand milligrams of lactoferrin at bedtime and the
artemisinin-berberine herbal mixture after meals.
Ulcerative
colitis is considered to be a distinct disease entity,
which must be separated from other disease entities,
especially infectious colitis. Intestinal infections
with amebic parasites or certain species of bacteria can
produce symptoms and signs indistinguishable from those
of ulcerative colitis. The main difference is that
antibiotics may cure infectious colitis but have a
rather inconsistent effect in ulcerative colitis.
Actually, the role of infection in ulcerative colitis,
although obscure, is not inconsequential. People with a
diagnosis of ulcerative colitis have an increased
susceptibility to infections of the large intestine,
which aggravate their colitis. Many people who develop
the disease in adulthood only acquire ulcerative colitis
after contracting a parasitic or bacterial
infection. Antibodies directed against the cells which
line the large intestine occur in patients with
ulcerative colitis, and may also be found in people with
chronic forms of infectious colitis. One theory holds
that ulcerative colitis is an autoimmune disease
provoked by an allergic reaction to micro-organisms in
the intestinal tract. Another theory holds that
ulcerative colitis may result from toxins produced by
intestinal bacteria. Both theories make the boundary
between infectious colitis and ulcerative colitis very
fuzzy. In addition to the possibility of multiple
infectious triggers in ulcerative colitis, the condition
may be aggravated by allergic reactions to foods or to
the very drugs used to treat mild cases of the disease.
Twenty per cent of patients with ulcerative colitis
improve by eliminating all milk protein from their
diets. Low fat diets may be useful in decreasing the
risk of colon cancer, because there is a direct
correlation between the development of cancer in
ulcerative colitis and the secretion of bile from the
liver; the liver secretes bile in response to eating
fatty foods.
Ulcerative
colitis is a complex illness that demands a flexibile
therapeutic approach. Like all chronic diseases, it is
far more clearly understood through its mediators,
triggers and antecedents in individual patients than as
an abstract disease entity. Conventional drug therapy of
ulcerative colitis has as its goal the suppression of
the mediators of inflammation. Little attention has been
paid to the divergent triggers of different patients.
Over the past twenty years I have found some patients in
whom ulcerative colitis was profoundly affected by diet,
or the composition of the intestinal bacterial flora, or
allergic reactions to intestinal yeast, or emotional
distress, or the smoking of cigarettes. Each has
responded differently to therapies which included diet
change, antibiotics or the administration of friendly
bacteria like Lactobacilli, but almost all have
responded, sometimes with complete remission of
symptoms. There are even some patients who develop
colitis when they stop smoking cigarettes and who
experience a complete remission of colitis when they
resume smoking.