|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fortunately there have been and are today scientists
who have continued along the other road ignored by
Pasteur. They have continued the pleomorphic line of
research with great veracity, though it is largely
suppressed and unknown in the United States.
The American medical establishment does not look at
live blood. Their practice of staining blood with
chemicals kills it. It also kills the ability to
really "see" what is going on. But in
looking at live blood, you can clearly "see"
that there are bacteria, microorganisms and parasites
that are not only in the blood, but over time they
grow, can change their shape, and research has proven,
they can become pathogenic (disease producing). This
ability of microorganisms to change is the concept of
pleomorphism we've been discussing. Understanding this
concept is also essential to the understanding of
cancer and its cure, and the cure of many other
diseases.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Looking at live blood under a microscope becomes an
incredible learning tool and begins an incredible
journey in understanding that there are living, creepy
crawly organisms that live in the environment of our
blood. These are the microorganisms and parasites that
truly constitute "the fungus among us."
______________________________________________
DARKFIELD MICROSCOPY
Today, researchers who look for organisms in live
blood use standard laboratory microscopes with high
magnification that are specially set up to view the
blood under "darkfield" or "phase
contrast" conditions. With darkfield this means
that the blood sample being viewed is actually in
front of a dark background and light is being angled
onto the blood sample from the sides. Under phase
contrast conditions, the light coming through the
specimen is shifted into two beams, one slightly out
of phase with the other. These techniques allow nearly
invisible microorganisms within the blood to be
"lit up" and seen. It also clearly
delineates the blood cells. This method is in contrast
to the standard microscope "brightfield"
conditions where light shines directly through the
viewed sample.
______________________________________________
Using this microscopic technology, German
bacteriologist Guenther Enderlein (a student of
Bechamp) discovered tiny microorganisms which he
called protits. These tiny microorganisms flourished
in the blood cells, plasma body fluids, and tissues,
living in harmony with the body in a symbiotic or
mutually beneficial relationship. He considered the
protit as one of the body's smallest, organized,
biological units. The most interesting thing about
this microorganism is its ability to change and adapt
to its environment. It was observed that when there
was severe change or deterioration in the body's
internal environment (most noted by changes in pH),
these microorganisms would pass through several
different stages of cyclic development, advancing from
harmless agents to disease producing (pathological)
bacteria or fungi. His book 'The Life Cycle of
Bacteria' (Bakterian Cyclogenie) presented his theory.
From his research he was able to produce natural
biological answers to many of the degenerative disease
processes plaguing western civilization today.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other researchers have continued along the path blazed
by Enderlein and have come to similar findings. Gaston
Naessens discovered the protit and has watched its
life cycle. He calls the protit a "somatid".
Naessens believes this protit/somatid predates DNA and
carries on genetic activity. It is the first thing
that condenses from light energy, and is the link
between light and matter.
Virginia Livingston-Wheeler also researched the protit
but called it "progenitor cryptocides."
Progenitor, meaning it existed through millennia, and
cryptocides being a cellular killer - essentially the
ancestral hidden killer cancer. Like Naessens,
Livingston did some excellent cancer research. Some of
her best research was done along with two other women,
Eleanor Alexander-Jackson and Irene Diller. They
referred to this microbe as the cancer microbe. But in
truth it is much more then that.
From all indications, Enderlein laid out some of the
best and most original findings and others took his
lead and furthered the research. Unfortunately, many
scientists work in isolation and for one reason or
another, a lot of information is unknown by the other,
not shared, or given hierarchical credit, therefore it
leaves many who follow in the dark and without the
full picture.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remember that blood is under pH control. Ideally it
has a pH in a narrow range around 7.3 which is
slightly alkaline. pH around 7.3 is the perfect
environment in which the protit lives in harmony with
the body. But when blood pH is disturbed and is
shifted out of that narrow range, these tiny
microorganisms can no longer live. In order to
survive, they will change to a form which can survive.
It is these new forms that can become aggressive,
parasitic and pathogenic agents within the blood.
Dr. Enderlein contended there are thousands of forms
and many of these are able to overcome the body's
defense mechanisms causing multiple disease
situations.
Some
Call it the Kleptic Microbe
Darkfield
microscopic studies conducted by Dr. Rudolph Alsleben
and Dr. Kurt Donsbach of the Hospital Santa Monica
clearly illustrated the proliferation of mutated
microorganisms in the blood of their sick patients.
What they observed was the dance of these microbes in
their pathogenic rage. They called it the 'kleptic
microbe'. Examining their patients live blood revealed
many of these microbes darting to and fro in the blood
plasma. The more ill the patient, the more microbes
observed. The sickest patients had swarming hordes of
these parasitic mutated microorganisms within the
blood causing great stress to their immune systems.
The doctors learned that when the blood was cleaned of
these kleptic microbes, it allowed the rejuvenation of
the immune system to progress in an orderly and rapid
fashion.
Dr. Robert Young, a microbiologist in Utah and author
of "One Sickness, One Disease, One
Treatment" discovered the truth about pleomorphic
behavior in the laboratory. He states that...
It is the over-acidification of the body through an
inverted way of eating and living that causes a
proliferation of the "fungus among us" which
debilitates the body and, if not corrected, will
ultimately cause our demise.
Dr. Young states that all illness is but this one
constitutional disease, its result is mycotoxicoses -
toxicity caused by mycotic infection, or in other
words, a yeast and fungus infection - the great
decomposers of living and dead bodies. From ashes to
ashes and dust to dust, this is natures decomposing
mechanism at work.
Fascinating isn't it? If you begin to understand this
concept, you will begin to understand a prime reason
behind why we get sick, how we get sick, and you will
realize that much of modern medicine is looking under
the wrong stones for answers to many disease
questions. For years now, medicine has considered
blood to be a sterile environment. But they're wrong.
Unfortunately, dead wrong for some of their patients.
Blood is not a sterile environment, nor is it a static
environment. That environment can change (most notably
through diet) and microorganisms in the blood can
evolve and change too. The fact is, we can see this
type of evolution and change going on throughout all
of nature. If you leave a bowl of milk out on the
kitchen table for a few days without refrigeration, it
will turn sour fairly quickly. Did it turn sour
because there was an outside germ that got into the
milk? No it did not. It turned sour because tiny
microbes already in the milk changed their form to
adapt to a changed environment.
The
Disease Paradigm Shift
One school
of thought (modern medicine and the monomorphic
perspective) says most disease is caused by germs or
some form of static disease causing microbe (the germ
theory). In order to get well, you should KILL the
germs. KILL the microbes. KILL whatever is making you
sick. Drugs, antibiotics, chemotherapy, radiation,
surgery.
The other school of thought (which encompasses most
other forms of the healing arts unrelated to medicine)
says most disease is caused by some imbalance in the
body brought about by some nutritional, electrical,
structural, toxicological or biological equation. In
order to get well, you need to re-establish balance in
your body by working with your body, not
against it.
For the pleomorphic scientists like Enderlein,
Naessens, Livingston, Young and others, disease is in
large measure a function of biology and it is a
biologically driven event that takes place in the body
when metabolic processes are thrown off. These
metabolic processes are thrown off largely by diet,
nutritional and environmental factors.
Embracing the biological view gives new insights to
the disease process and is truly another paradigm for
understanding health.
For some researchers, it all boils down to this..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
